303
edits
Changes
no edit summary
::I can't help it if you've not met any. As I said, I know quite a few (yeah, okay, I'm not suggesting that my "sample" is random. My point is that they really exist). If rabbits were found in the carboniferous, would it continue to be labelled "carboniferous"? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::I can't help it if you've not met any. As I said, I know quite a few (yeah, okay, I'm not suggesting that my "sample" is random. My point is that they really exist). If rabbits were found in the carboniferous, would it continue to be labelled "carboniferous"? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
:::These "scientists" are welcome to submit their discovery of Carboniferous rabbits if they find them. It would directly contradict everything we thought we knew about evolution and geology. If the flood "model" is correct, we ought to be able to find such inconsistancies (and where are the giants?). [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 12:08, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
: The link follows, Philip. Remember to keep an open mind. Behold, for [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG#Creationism| the truth] shall set you free.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
: The link follows, Philip. Remember to keep an open mind. Behold, for [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG#Creationism| the truth] shall set you free.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::Finding the section wasn't the problem, it was finding a treatment that was "good". ;-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::Finding the section wasn't the problem, it was finding a treatment that was "good". ;-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)