14
edits
Changes
Talk:Godless: The Church of Liberalism (view source)
Revision as of 06:20, January 28, 2009
, 06:20, January 28, 2009→Reversion: new section
:::It could still be a "god" in a metaphorical sense like the one I presented above. Maybe someone who has read her book can clarify this? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:34, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
:::It could still be a "god" in a metaphorical sense like the one I presented above. Maybe someone who has read her book can clarify this? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:34, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
::::Yes, that would be most helpful-- As would a note in the article to the same extent. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:35, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
::::Yes, that would be most helpful-- As would a note in the article to the same extent. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:35, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
== Reversion ==
Why was a quote from another author re-added to the article? It adds nothing to the article, as it has nothing to do with the book. [[User:JoelR|JoelR]] 01:20, 28 January 2009 (EST)