152
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + +
→A Total Failure
: I agree that M-theory is not a total failure, because it has generated some interesting math. However as a unified field theory to explain the forces of nature, it is a failure. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:03, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
: I agree that M-theory is not a total failure, because it has generated some interesting math. However as a unified field theory to explain the forces of nature, it is a failure. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:03, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
:: It's potential for success as a unified field theory remains open to question. This is not quite the same thing as being a "failure". You know, quantum electrodynamics also went through a rather long rough period before it was finally accepted as the official theory of light and matter.--[[User:Lemonpeel|Lemonpeel]] 21:37, 16 June 2009 (EDT)