Changes

612 bytes added ,  21:24, June 23, 2009
Line 112: Line 112:     
Cuban "Rob"olution should be changed to Cuban Revolution as that is the historical name for that period of Cuban history and "Rob"olution isn't encyclopedic or professional sounding and comes off as the author's personal view rather then a historical descriptive term. I can see such a term in an 'essay' piece but not as an encyclopedic article. -- [[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 17:14, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
 
Cuban "Rob"olution should be changed to Cuban Revolution as that is the historical name for that period of Cuban history and "Rob"olution isn't encyclopedic or professional sounding and comes off as the author's personal view rather then a historical descriptive term. I can see such a term in an 'essay' piece but not as an encyclopedic article. -- [[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 17:14, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
*Unlike liberal encyclopedia's, BM, Conservapedia believes if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is indeed a duck. The so-called Communist Revolution robbed the Cuban people, plain and simple.  Anyone who does a few hours research knows that Guevara was a sadist, and indeed, finally a cowering coward. The man did nothing in his life to admire, so a person would have to be pretty stupid, as all of the classes identified in the article are, to admire such a fraud. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:24, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits