Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 bytes added ,  22:32, July 13, 2009
Reordering the examples
Line 3: Line 3:  
==In Science and Logic==   
 
==In Science and Logic==   
   −
For example, the well-proven theory that cigarettes cause [[lung cancer]] has the '''counterexample''' of the (rare) individual who might smoke his entire life and not develop lung cancer.  The counterexample does not disprove the theory.
+
A '''counterexample''' cannot disprove correlation or causation.  An example of flawed [[liberal logic]] is the use of a counterexample to argue that a theory is false, as in "I don't go to church and I'm not a bad person, and therefore church is not needed."
   −
A '''counterexample''' cannot disprove correlation or causation.  An example of flawed [[liberal logic]] is the use of a counterexample to argue that a theory is false, as in "I don't go to church and I'm not a bad person, and therefore church is not needed."
+
Another example is the well-proven theory that cigarettes cause [[lung cancer]].  An '''counterexample''' of the (rare) individual who might smoke his entire life and not develop lung cancer.  The counterexample does not disprove the theory.
    
A theory of universality, such as the claim that ''all'' species [[theory of evolution|evolved]], can be disproved by just one '''counterexample''', such as a species (like the [[whale]]) that lacks a plausible evolutionary path.  See [[Counterexamples to Evolution]].
 
A theory of universality, such as the claim that ''all'' species [[theory of evolution|evolved]], can be disproved by just one '''counterexample''', such as a species (like the [[whale]]) that lacks a plausible evolutionary path.  See [[Counterexamples to Evolution]].
20

edits

Navigation menu