2,732
edits
Changes
→Busing & beyond!
: It is irrelevant. Scalia has been on the Supreme Court for about 20 years. Write about what he has actually said and done, instead of trying to extrapolate his logic to other issues. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:28, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
: It is irrelevant. Scalia has been on the Supreme Court for about 20 years. Write about what he has actually said and done, instead of trying to extrapolate his logic to other issues. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:28, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
:: It's not extrapolation to state that what he is opposed to is prevalent in modern jurisprudence. I realize, however, that it's probably not something you want to hear, since I'm betting you like him a lot. Actually, he's a great justice on Admin Law... textualism works there.... but when extended into conlaw it does flow against Brown.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:29, 28 March 2007 (EDT)