| | :::::::::Here is another example of how I imagine potential changes in meta tags could be used for Conservapedia.com: [http://www.mixx.com/stories/8770713/conservapedia_wiki_encyclopedia Conservapedia - Wiki Encyclopedia - Mixx] (but without using "Mixx," since that's simply a meta title used by Mixx.com.) | | :::::::::Here is another example of how I imagine potential changes in meta tags could be used for Conservapedia.com: [http://www.mixx.com/stories/8770713/conservapedia_wiki_encyclopedia Conservapedia - Wiki Encyclopedia - Mixx] (but without using "Mixx," since that's simply a meta title used by Mixx.com.) |
| | :::::::::For instance, currently if you Google for "Conservapedia," the website meta tag title for the site displays the search result "Conservapedia." It's simple and surely, it does work. However, if minor changes are made with (assuming behind the scenes data uses HTML???) Conservapedia's meta tag title, description, etc., to improve the search result to show, "Conservapedia - Wiki Encyclopedia," as well using a meta description that says, "conservapedia.com — [[Conservapedia]] is a [[conservative]], family-friendly [[Wiki]] [[encyclopedia]]." This will certainly help increase SEO results for Conservapedia.com. The current meta description for "Conservapedia" in a google search result show this, "An encyclopaedia with articles written from a conservative viewpoint." So it's close to what I'm suggesting, but I'm optimistically confident that the small changes I hope can be made will help with SEO. This is a benefit to the entire community. As for the "New Welcome Banner," that may simply act as another method for google's crawlers to find pages within Conservapedia much easier. Because I can confidently say right now, Google's spiders are not finding new pages very quickly. This isn't necessarily a "problem," and I'm trying to be as polite and civil about this as possible, but it does hinder the potential search traffic that this site could be getting by not making these small changes. And none of these small changes require the much larger change to the default URL, which is what I was suggesting earlier. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 21:03, 2 November 2009 (EST) | | :::::::::For instance, currently if you Google for "Conservapedia," the website meta tag title for the site displays the search result "Conservapedia." It's simple and surely, it does work. However, if minor changes are made with (assuming behind the scenes data uses HTML???) Conservapedia's meta tag title, description, etc., to improve the search result to show, "Conservapedia - Wiki Encyclopedia," as well using a meta description that says, "conservapedia.com — [[Conservapedia]] is a [[conservative]], family-friendly [[Wiki]] [[encyclopedia]]." This will certainly help increase SEO results for Conservapedia.com. The current meta description for "Conservapedia" in a google search result show this, "An encyclopaedia with articles written from a conservative viewpoint." So it's close to what I'm suggesting, but I'm optimistically confident that the small changes I hope can be made will help with SEO. This is a benefit to the entire community. As for the "New Welcome Banner," that may simply act as another method for google's crawlers to find pages within Conservapedia much easier. Because I can confidently say right now, Google's spiders are not finding new pages very quickly. This isn't necessarily a "problem," and I'm trying to be as polite and civil about this as possible, but it does hinder the potential search traffic that this site could be getting by not making these small changes. And none of these small changes require the much larger change to the default URL, which is what I was suggesting earlier. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 21:03, 2 November 2009 (EST) |