Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 148: Line 148:  
:Two things, JamesMackenzie: First, I did investigate evolution, I know full-well what evolution consists of; I know it's a claimed "change over time" scenario; and I know full-well that evolutionists such as yourself have no intention of backing those claims up with absolute proof.  I and others on this site are fed up with being given a the "hearsay" argument by evolutionists, and ''hearsay'' is all they got.  Second, when directed to provide proof of evolution ''as per the Scientific Method'', you back down and turn your reply into the rant that is here.  It is you who is ignoring the debunked evidence.   
 
:Two things, JamesMackenzie: First, I did investigate evolution, I know full-well what evolution consists of; I know it's a claimed "change over time" scenario; and I know full-well that evolutionists such as yourself have no intention of backing those claims up with absolute proof.  I and others on this site are fed up with being given a the "hearsay" argument by evolutionists, and ''hearsay'' is all they got.  Second, when directed to provide proof of evolution ''as per the Scientific Method'', you back down and turn your reply into the rant that is here.  It is you who is ignoring the debunked evidence.   
 
:So, when directed to prove it, you demonstrated an attitude problem.  I think you need to edit somewhere else.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:42, 5 November 2009 (EST)
 
:So, when directed to prove it, you demonstrated an attitude problem.  I think you need to edit somewhere else.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:42, 5 November 2009 (EST)
 +
::Just a quick note, you seem to have misunderstood the scientific method. The aim is not to 'prove' the theory of evolution, this, as with all general theories, is logically impossible. Science operates by trying to falsify theories. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:45, 5 November 2009 (EST)
209

edits

Navigation menu