Changes

no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:     
:::Please do.  Your edits are always welcome, and you've suggested an improvement here.  Thank you for making this change.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:20, 28 November 2009 (EST)
 
:::Please do.  Your edits are always welcome, and you've suggested an improvement here.  Thank you for making this change.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:20, 28 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::Why would logic dictate that?  Mass is a scalar, and a force from any direction should encounter the same increased mass, not different masses from different directions.
 +
 +
::I suppose that under Newtonian mechanics, a moving object has a velocity of 0 within the plane perpendicular to its line of motion, and any forces operating in that plane will act on the object as if it is at rest.  But that's not what ''logic'' dictates, that's what the ''previous theory'' dictates. 
 +
 +
::Essentially your counterexample to relativity is that it makes a prediction that contradicts Newton's laws.  This is neithe r a contradiction nor a logical problem, and it is should be edited out.[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]]
30

edits