Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, oversight, protect, rollback
1,839
edits
Changes
→Students bearing arms: RE:
I agree that students certainly shouldn't bring guns or clainsaws into class, but the zero-tolerence rules are ''way'' too strict, leaving students vulnerable because we can't even have a glass drink bottle whereas trespassers may have M-16s and grenades. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 21:52, 6 February 2010 (EST)
I agree that students certainly shouldn't bring guns or clainsaws into class, but the zero-tolerence rules are ''way'' too strict, leaving students vulnerable because we can't even have a glass drink bottle whereas trespassers may have M-16s and grenades. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 21:52, 6 February 2010 (EST)
:The zero-tolerance rules ''are'' ridiculous, as evidenced by students being drug out in handcuffs for doodling on a desk, being suspended because of a harmless shotgun shell, etc. I just didn't want the article to read like Conservapedia advocated students bringing handguns into school. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 11:05, 7 February 2010 (EST)
:The zero-tolerance rules ''are'' ridiculous, as evidenced by students being drug out in handcuffs for doodling on a desk, being suspended because of a harmless shotgun shell, etc. I just didn't want the article to read like Conservapedia advocated students bringing handguns into school. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 11:05, 7 February 2010 (EST)
::Fair enough. Perhaps a better way of putting it would be ''zero-tolerence policies leave students and staff defenseless and restrict their right to property''? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 12:41, 7 February 2010 (EST)