Changes

Talk:Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness (view source)

Revision as of 19:40, February 25, 2010

296 bytes added , 19:40, February 25, 2010

→‎The gravity question: It is the ''only'' logical deduction. It is true with a mathematical certainty, which is why the denial of it is so illustrative of a closed mind.

Line 187: Line 187:

:: The orbits crash ... when? The orbits are not going to be significantly different over reasonable periods of time for an exponent that only slightly differs from 2.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:54, 25 February 2010 (EST)

::: At first glance that is the most logical deduction. However I challenge you to run the simulation with any commercial or free physics or mathematic software suite. I'm sure you can give this as a homework assignment to one of your students. The orbits change in very significant ways, and as I said, they are going to move through the sun (not near, exactly through).[[User:Marnick|Marnick]] 13:56, 25 February 2010 (EST)

+

:::: My statement is not merely at "first glance ... the most logical deduction." It is the ''only'' logical deduction. It is true with a mathematical certainty, which is why the denial of it is so illustrative of a closed mind.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:40, 25 February 2010 (EST)

==Unclear questions==

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,234

edits