1,590
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 122:
Line 122: + + + +
→Slight change to wording?: new section
Is there a specific citation available for that statement? It is directly contradicted by Jon Lee Anderson's ''Che Guevara: A Revolutionary Life'', which states, ''"In June, Ernesto obtained a copy of his doctor’s degree, and a few days later he celebrated his twenty-fifth birthday. With his title in hand and duly legalized, he was now a bona fide doctor."'' While I do recall Fontova being critical of Anderson's work on the topic, is there a specific denial of this claim or a presentation of a contrary account in his own book? [[User:Agnapostate|Agnapostate]] 07:47, 9 January 2010 (EST)
Is there a specific citation available for that statement? It is directly contradicted by Jon Lee Anderson's ''Che Guevara: A Revolutionary Life'', which states, ''"In June, Ernesto obtained a copy of his doctor’s degree, and a few days later he celebrated his twenty-fifth birthday. With his title in hand and duly legalized, he was now a bona fide doctor."'' While I do recall Fontova being critical of Anderson's work on the topic, is there a specific denial of this claim or a presentation of a contrary account in his own book? [[User:Agnapostate|Agnapostate]] 07:47, 9 January 2010 (EST)
== Slight change to wording? ==
In the section titled "Cuban Revolution," the entry reads "'''In 1955, a hobo living Guevara met Raul and Fidel Castro...'''" This wording doesn't sound correct to me. I don't know much about Guevara at any point in his life, but is this meant to imply that he was living as a hobo when he met the Castro brothers? If so, could it be changed to something like "'''In 1955, while living as a hobo, Guevara met Raul and Fidel Castro...'''" etc. I assume that this isn't vandalism, since the article is locked to prevent it, but as I said, I don't know nearly enough about Guevara to accurately say whether or not he was a hobo. In Christ, [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] 21:45, 18 March 2010 (EDT)