Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Quantum Mechanics and Free Will: I think more atheists deny QM than people of faith do, and unlike the theory of relativity, QM has produced immensely productive inventions
Line 231: Line 231:     
This is my first potential edit on Conservapedia, and so I am hesitant in making it, and would make it only if I get a go head from [[User:Aschlafly]] or one of the other administrators. I think that similar to relativity, we could include an argument on theological grounds against Quantum Mechanics. The one theological objection I had in mind was in relation to free will, for which Quantum Mechanics can possibly provide no explanation. I believe this gives theology precedence over science, so should I include this point in the article? [[User:CirceCook|CirceCook]] 07:31, 29 June 2010 (EDT)
 
This is my first potential edit on Conservapedia, and so I am hesitant in making it, and would make it only if I get a go head from [[User:Aschlafly]] or one of the other administrators. I think that similar to relativity, we could include an argument on theological grounds against Quantum Mechanics. The one theological objection I had in mind was in relation to free will, for which Quantum Mechanics can possibly provide no explanation. I believe this gives theology precedence over science, so should I include this point in the article? [[User:CirceCook|CirceCook]] 07:31, 29 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Thanks for your suggestion, but please explain your objection to [[QM]] more clearly first.  I think more [[atheists]] deny [[QM]] than people of [[faith]] do, and unlike the [[theory of relativity]], [[QM]] has produced immensely productive inventions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 08:13, 29 June 2010 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu