1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 227:
Line 227: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Quantifying Order (view source)
Revision as of 11:31, June 29, 2010
, 11:31, June 29, 2010Request for permission to include an edit
:Do you know what a [[provocateur]] is? We have a [[90/10 rule]] and it is enforced to prevent all talk from impeding improvements. Please improve entries here, or move on.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:37, 23 November 2009 (EST)
:Do you know what a [[provocateur]] is? We have a [[90/10 rule]] and it is enforced to prevent all talk from impeding improvements. Please improve entries here, or move on.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:37, 23 November 2009 (EST)
==Quantum Mechanics and Free Will==
This is my first potential edit on Conservapedia, and so I am hesitant in making it, and would make it only if I get a go head from [[User:Aschlafly]] or one of the other administrators. I think that similar to relativity, we could include an argument on theological grounds against Quantum Mechanics. The one theological objection I had in mind was in relation to free will, for which Quantum Mechanics can possibly provide no explanation. I believe this gives theology precedence over science, so should I include this point in the article? [[User:CirceCook|CirceCook]] 07:31, 29 June 2010 (EDT)