Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 223:
Line 223: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Quantifying Order (view source)
Revision as of 22:37, November 23, 2009
, 22:37, November 23, 2009We have a 90/10 rule and it is enforced to prevent all talk from impeding improvements. Please improve entries here, or move on.
:Danielitld, if you can't discuss the issues politely, please don't discuss them at all. Only warning. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 17:22, 23 November 2009 (EST)
:Danielitld, if you can't discuss the issues politely, please don't discuss them at all. Only warning. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 17:22, 23 November 2009 (EST)
:Danielitld, Jacob's point is well-taken. A quick review of [[Special:Contributions/Danielitld|your edits]] reveals a pattern of nearly all talk and almost no substantive contributions. First you consumed much of MBack's time (he disagreed with you), now you're doing the same here in consuming the time of other valuable editors.
:Do you know what a [[provocateur]] is? We have a [[90/10 rule]] and it is enforced to prevent all talk from impeding improvements. Please improve entries here, or move on.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:37, 23 November 2009 (EST)