278
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 13:56, April 1, 2007
, 13:56, April 1, 2007→Number 2: Nowhere does wikipedia mention sex-based.
And, as far as I can see, the article is a good article; its well-cited, informative, and unbiased.[[User:NickJ10|NickJ10]] 08:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
And, as far as I can see, the article is a good article; its well-cited, informative, and unbiased.[[User:NickJ10|NickJ10]] 08:39, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:Nowhere does the wiki article mention a sex-based health clinic.
:The simple fact is it describes a health clinic which, amongst other things, also deals with [[family planning]] and [[sexually transmitted disease]] issues, the clinic also freely distributes [[condoms]] to students. I know [[conservative]]s don't like [[sex]] but making out that a clinic dealing in such issues is some how sex-based is opinion not fact. ''Wikipedia editors apparently like'' that. No, they described what had been done. If I describe the fact that had rained outside does that mean ''I apparently like'' rain?
:This site is surely some kind of April Fools joke ok?
:[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 09:56, 1 April 2007 (EDT)