Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
mLine 41:
Line 41: − +
→Your requested feedback: signing
:One ToE article is all we need. My suggestion is only to have a page where the debate itself is outlined. Or not. I'm an "easily led Christian". Just tell me what to do. By "aspects of evolution" I meant something else. I will explain at length later. I'm posting this before a computer glitch eats this long reply.
:One ToE article is all we need. My suggestion is only to have a page where the debate itself is outlined. Or not. I'm an "easily led Christian". Just tell me what to do. By "aspects of evolution" I meant something else. I will explain at length later. I'm posting this before a computer glitch eats this long reply.
:I have 5 links to read, and I still haven't finished entering the handwritten corrections I made on a printout of [[American Civil War]]. One thing about this project, is, there's no shortage of volunteer opportunities! :-)
:I have 5 links to read, and I still haven't finished entering the handwritten corrections I made on a printout of [[American Civil War]]. One thing about this project, is, there's no shortage of volunteer opportunities! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:41, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
== How can there be a debate? ==
== How can there be a debate? ==
How can there be a debate when each time an article is created, it is filled with selective, out of context quotes and then locked? A debate requires that each side be allowed to contribute. Anything else is simply a staged show. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 16:09, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
How can there be a debate when each time an article is created, it is filled with selective, out of context quotes and then locked? A debate requires that each side be allowed to contribute. Anything else is simply a staged show. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 16:09, 2 April 2007 (EDT)