1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 46:
Line 46: + + + +
→How can there be a debate?
How can there be a debate when each time an article is created, it is filled with selective, out of context quotes and then locked? A debate requires that each side be allowed to contribute. Anything else is simply a staged show. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 16:09, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
How can there be a debate when each time an article is created, it is filled with selective, out of context quotes and then locked? A debate requires that each side be allowed to contribute. Anything else is simply a staged show. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 16:09, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
:Well, Conservapedia is not neutral to all points of view (only to facts), and (to quote our Webmaster) "[t]here is no such thing as a 'consensus document' on Conservapedia", anyway. This is a debate where (Young Earth) Creationism is obviously right, so why waste space with giving a just account of what the other side has to say? Any screentime we give those atheist liberals might potentially corrupt good Christians into doubting their views. Surely you don't want that.
:On a more serious note (I swear, I lost dozens of IQ points writing that), I agree. It's extremely disturbing that an article with THREE edits (incl. the creation) mentions locking and owning in the very first Talk page comment. Is that the official practice by now? How many locked-and-owned articles are there already? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:51, 2 April 2007 (EDT)