Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + + + + + +
slow and steady wins the race - Ed shows his "ancient Greek" bias
:On a more serious note (I swear, I lost dozens of IQ points writing that), I agree. It's extremely disturbing that an article with THREE edits (incl. the creation) mentions locking and owning in the very first Talk page comment. Is that the official practice by now? How many locked-and-owned articles are there already? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:51, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
:On a more serious note (I swear, I lost dozens of IQ points writing that), I agree. It's extremely disturbing that an article with THREE edits (incl. the creation) mentions locking and owning in the very first Talk page comment. Is that the official practice by now? How many locked-and-owned articles are there already? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:51, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::The [[origins debate]] article is not protected, and has no history of being protected. It is, however, a kind of joint project between me and [[user:Conservative]]. You might say I am writing it under C's editorial direction. I am comfortable with that.
::This article is not intended to be a place to '''conduct''' a debate: there are 2 or more other places at Conservapedia for that. This article should only outline what the last two centuries of '''scholarly''' debate has been about.
::I'm only going to put published views in here. I'm going to describe the sides so well that each side will say, "Yup, that's what we believe all right." (Scientists would probably word that as, "Yes, that is a factual representation of the current understanding of the modern synthesis . . . blah, blah, blah.) For me it all comes down to positions. X says Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:17, 3 April 2007 (EDT)