1,767
edits
Changes
→How can there be a debate?
::I'm only going to put published views in here. I'm going to describe the sides so well that each side will say, "Yup, that's what we believe all right." (Scientists would probably word that as, "Yes, that is a factual representation of the current understanding of the modern synthesis . . . blah, blah, blah.) For me it all comes down to positions. X says Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:17, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::I'm only going to put published views in here. I'm going to describe the sides so well that each side will say, "Yup, that's what we believe all right." (Scientists would probably word that as, "Yes, that is a factual representation of the current understanding of the modern synthesis . . . blah, blah, blah.) For me it all comes down to positions. X says Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:17, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:::We were talking about Conservative's musing up at the top of the page (point 1). And while this article doesn't have a history of being locked (yet), Conservative (among others) has a history of locking articles and editing them to reflect only his PoV. If this article somehow becomes an exception to this practice, that's awesome. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 13:03, 3 April 2007 (EDT)