Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, oversight, Administrators
2,260
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Feel free to write about Creationist ideas, but be sure to label them properly. Do not pretend that they have become mainstream, if they have not. Wikipedia frequently censors ideas, on the grounds that including them would violate some sort of "equal time" provision of their NPOV policy, but that is just an excuse. Any relevant idea may be placed in an article. You just have to explain its revelance, and avoid making a minority view '''appear''' to have more support than it does. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 8 February 2011 (EST)
Feel free to write about Creationist ideas, but be sure to label them properly. Do not pretend that they have become mainstream, if they have not. Wikipedia frequently censors ideas, on the grounds that including them would violate some sort of "equal time" provision of their NPOV policy, but that is just an excuse. Any relevant idea may be placed in an article. You just have to explain its revelance, and avoid making a minority view '''appear''' to have more support than it does. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 8 February 2011 (EST)
:Leaving aside the bit about how "mainstream" the idea is, I suspect the rest of the info should be put back in, as AiG is among the best sources on YEC scientific explanations, and is cited. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 17:09, 8 February 2011 (EST)