Changes

Dennett is widely regarded by illogical [[atheism|atheists]], who suppress the evidence for an [[intelligent design|intelligent designer]], as one of the premier philosophers in the world in the area of consciousness.  Dennet's book ''Consciousness Explained'' is beloved by those who deny God in favor of a [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] naturalist [[philosophy]] of the mind.  However, Christian apologetists recognize his specious atheistic nonsense for its inability to solve real world questions concerning consciousness.<ref>http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/old-material-dennett-and-mind</ref><ref>http://creation.com/brain-chemistry-and-the-fate-of-the-personality-after-death</ref>  Dennet proposes his initial multiple drafts model of consciousness, where he proposes that there is no single source of consciousness (no conscious qualia), as proposed by many of his contemporaries).

Dennett is widely regarded by illogical [[atheism|atheists]], who suppress the evidence for an [[intelligent design|intelligent designer]], as one of the premier philosophers in the world in the area of consciousness.  Dennet's book ''Consciousness Explained'' is beloved by those who deny God in favor of a [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] naturalist [[philosophy]] of the mind.  However, Christian apologetists recognize his specious atheistic nonsense for its inability to solve real world questions concerning consciousness.<ref>http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/old-material-dennett-and-mind</ref><ref>http://creation.com/brain-chemistry-and-the-fate-of-the-personality-after-death</ref>  Dennet proposes his initial multiple drafts model of consciousness, where he proposes that there is no single source of consciousness (no conscious qualia), as proposed by many of his contemporaries).

He has been heavily criticized by some of his peers for denying the existence of qualia and sticking with his naturalist models of consciousness (he later expanded the multiple drafts model to the [[fame in the brain]] model in his 2005 book ''Sweet Dreams'') as he insists that there is no evidence, and that neurological [[science]] will, in time, progress to make the idea of qualia, or the source of seemingly inexplicable functions in the mind, obsolete.

He has been heavily criticized by some of his peers for denying the existence of qualia and sticking with his naturalist models of consciousness (he later expanded the multiple drafts model to the fame in the brain model in his 2005 book ''Sweet Dreams'') as he insists that there is no evidence, and that neurological [[science]] will, in time, progress to make the idea of qualia, or the source of seemingly inexplicable functions in the mind, obsolete.

Dennett has also been a proponent of Evolutionary Psychology as well as [[Richard Dawkins]]' idea of the meme. This lead to some notable clashes with paleontologist [[Stephen Jay Gould]].

Dennett has also been a proponent of Evolutionary Psychology as well as [[Richard Dawkins]]' idea of the meme. This lead to some notable clashes with paleontologist [[Stephen Jay Gould]].