Changes

no edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:     
:: Kerik is a non issue the liberals like to wash Giuliani with. Firefighters still love the guy, it's the liberal firefighters union that does not. I can't think of any democrat nominee with any commander-n-chief experience what so ever. Speaking of firefighter rants. Nothing but cheers for Hillary from the union. Even though she did not attend a single funeral, not one firefighter funeral after 9/11. Liberals are just scared of Giuliani, its the same old attack strategy. I still hold to the fact Giuliani says stay on the attack against terror. Thats all I want to hear. I don't want some politically correct, balance the line, foreign policy. I want to add to thee 2000+ days of no attack on the USA.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 02:19, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Kerik is a non issue the liberals like to wash Giuliani with. Firefighters still love the guy, it's the liberal firefighters union that does not. I can't think of any democrat nominee with any commander-n-chief experience what so ever. Speaking of firefighter rants. Nothing but cheers for Hillary from the union. Even though she did not attend a single funeral, not one firefighter funeral after 9/11. Liberals are just scared of Giuliani, its the same old attack strategy. I still hold to the fact Giuliani says stay on the attack against terror. Thats all I want to hear. I don't want some politically correct, balance the line, foreign policy. I want to add to thee 2000+ days of no attack on the USA.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 02:19, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
Kerik was a major mistake and it is an example of how Giuliani will operate, he's careless, he's not a competent leader. As for firefighters, there are about 1 million firefighters in the US out of which 250,000 are full time the rest are volunteers the International Association of Fire Fighters has over 280,000 members, they are the major voice for firefighters and they do not support Guiliani, firefighters do not love the guy, not even when he's out on the town wearing a dress and high heels, he is not Presidential material. I agree that staying on the attack against terror is a good strategy but it is not the only method. To suggest that is the sole reason there has been no attacks in the US is ridiculous, by that rational you could claim that after the first attack on the trade center in 1993 that Clinton's plans/policy kept the US safe for 2000+ days too. Giuliani needs to do more than come up with sound bites about how he'll "stay on the attack" policy is more complicated than that.--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 02:10, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
17

edits