2,358
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: + +
Debate:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him. (view source)
Revision as of 06:11, April 7, 2007
, 06:11, April 7, 2007no edit summary
Kerik was a major mistake and it is an example of how Giuliani will operate, he's careless, he's not a competent leader. As for firefighters, there are about 1 million firefighters in the US out of which 250,000 are full time the rest are volunteers the International Association of Fire Fighters has over 280,000 members, they are the major voice for firefighters and they do not support Guiliani, firefighters do not love the guy, not even when he's out on the town wearing a dress and high heels, he is not Presidential material. I agree that staying on the attack against terror is a good strategy but it is not the only method. To suggest that is the sole reason there has been no attacks in the US is ridiculous, by that rational you could claim that after the first attack on the trade center in 1993 that Clinton's plans/policy kept the US safe for 2000+ days too. Giuliani needs to do more than come up with sound bites about how he'll "stay on the attack" policy is more complicated than that.--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 02:10, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
Kerik was a major mistake and it is an example of how Giuliani will operate, he's careless, he's not a competent leader. As for firefighters, there are about 1 million firefighters in the US out of which 250,000 are full time the rest are volunteers the International Association of Fire Fighters has over 280,000 members, they are the major voice for firefighters and they do not support Guiliani, firefighters do not love the guy, not even when he's out on the town wearing a dress and high heels, he is not Presidential material. I agree that staying on the attack against terror is a good strategy but it is not the only method. To suggest that is the sole reason there has been no attacks in the US is ridiculous, by that rational you could claim that after the first attack on the trade center in 1993 that Clinton's plans/policy kept the US safe for 2000+ days too. Giuliani needs to do more than come up with sound bites about how he'll "stay on the attack" policy is more complicated than that.--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 02:10, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
I would consider voting third party to send the Republican Party a message that they can't just nominate any old fool and expect me to vote lockstep for them. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:11, 7 April 2007 (EDT)