Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + Line 28:
Line 28: + +
Debate:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him. (view source)
Revision as of 16:39, April 7, 2007
, 16:39, April 7, 2007no edit summary
{{debate}}
--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 12:39, 7 April 2007 (EDT){{debate}}
Giuliani is a Republican but as for social conservative issues, he is too liberal. He might be the Presidential nominee of our party. I kept asking myself, how could I vote for somebody pro-abortion and pro-gay rights? Then I heard a unique viewpoint I thought I should share. If we do not elect a President strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy, there might not be an America left to have abortions. I certainly want my child to grow up in a safe secure America. Giuliani is strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy. In a time of war, this nation cannot afford to take chances with a Democrat President.
Giuliani is a Republican but as for social conservative issues, he is too liberal. He might be the Presidential nominee of our party. I kept asking myself, how could I vote for somebody pro-abortion and pro-gay rights? Then I heard a unique viewpoint I thought I should share. If we do not elect a President strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy, there might not be an America left to have abortions. I certainly want my child to grow up in a safe secure America. Giuliani is strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy. In a time of war, this nation cannot afford to take chances with a Democrat President.
I would consider voting third party to send the Republican Party a message that they can't just nominate any old fool and expect me to vote lockstep for them. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:11, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
I would consider voting third party to send the Republican Party a message that they can't just nominate any old fool and expect me to vote lockstep for them. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:11, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
: Hey Dew, that's exactly the kind of thought process I am trying to prevent. Here is what your actions will dew. By sending a message to Republicans that you don't like it's leaders social positions, you are giving the Presidency to Hillary. Not only will she defend abortion rights, she will load the judicial system with pro-abortion supporters. On top of that, we will go back in time whereby we ignore terror and slash the military. We become laughingstock national security without a strong leader. The message you are sending is- come defeat America, the time is right. I guess your actions will have the desired affect- end abortions. Because nobody will be getting abortions during nuclear war!