Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:United States presidential election, 2012 (view source)

Revision as of 05:37, February 9, 2012

152 bytes added ,  05:37, February 9, 2012
→‎Ranking by Likelihood of Winning Republican Nomination ?: it's best to keep key related information in one entry, like a real encyclopedia
Line 337: Line 337:  
Shouldn't we reorganize the Ranking by Likelihood of Winning Republican Nomination ? I believe Jeb Bush and Sarah Palin do have less chances to win than Ron Paul or Rick Santorum. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:33, 5 February 2012 (EST)
 
Shouldn't we reorganize the Ranking by Likelihood of Winning Republican Nomination ? I believe Jeb Bush and Sarah Palin do have less chances to win than Ron Paul or Rick Santorum. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:33, 5 February 2012 (EST)
 
:What about moving info about Republican candidates to [[2012 Republican Primaries]] ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:44, 5 February 2012 (EST)
 
:What about moving info about Republican candidates to [[2012 Republican Primaries]] ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:44, 5 February 2012 (EST)
 +
 +
::No, it's best to keep key related information in one entry, like a real encyclopedia.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:37, 9 February 2012 (EST)
    
==Predictions: Andy Schlafly vs. Andy Schlafly==
 
==Predictions: Andy Schlafly vs. Andy Schlafly==
 
There's seems to be two users on this site both named Aschlafly. Both Aschlafly's like making [[Presidential election 2012|presidential election predictions]]. But they can't seem to agree with each other. One says it's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&action=historysubmit&diff=959694&oldid=959693| Jeb Bush]. The other thinks it's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&action=historysubmit&diff=943924&oldid=943593| Newt]. One predicted [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&action=historysubmit&diff=938684&oldid=938671| Sarah Palin] wouldn't run. Meanwhile, the other ranks her [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&action=historysubmit&diff=959693&oldid=959011| fourth in line for the nomination]. So which Andy Schlafly should we be listening to? And is it possible that they ''both'' might be wrong? --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 00:34, 9 February 2012 (EST)
 
There's seems to be two users on this site both named Aschlafly. Both Aschlafly's like making [[Presidential election 2012|presidential election predictions]]. But they can't seem to agree with each other. One says it's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&action=historysubmit&diff=959694&oldid=959693| Jeb Bush]. The other thinks it's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&action=historysubmit&diff=943924&oldid=943593| Newt]. One predicted [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&action=historysubmit&diff=938684&oldid=938671| Sarah Palin] wouldn't run. Meanwhile, the other ranks her [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&action=historysubmit&diff=959693&oldid=959011| fourth in line for the nomination]. So which Andy Schlafly should we be listening to? And is it possible that they ''both'' might be wrong? --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 00:34, 9 February 2012 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,891

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/960073"

Navigation menu