Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
898 bytes added ,  22:36, April 9, 2007
Line 198: Line 198:     
::: I didn't twist, contort, remove or censor the quote.  I didn't modify any part of the article Andy had contributed to or (so far as I can tell) commented on.  I removed the classification claiming that Maxwell as a creationist.  Although it's not defined here, I assume a creationist is someone who believes in [[creationism]], which ''is'' defined here: "Belief in the literal interpretation of the account of the creation of the universe and of all living things related in the Bible."  Nothing in the quote speaks to Biblical literalism of any sort, nor has any other evidence been offered despite repeated requests for it.  I think the reversion and the protection are wholly inappropriate. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 18:22, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::: I didn't twist, contort, remove or censor the quote.  I didn't modify any part of the article Andy had contributed to or (so far as I can tell) commented on.  I removed the classification claiming that Maxwell as a creationist.  Although it's not defined here, I assume a creationist is someone who believes in [[creationism]], which ''is'' defined here: "Belief in the literal interpretation of the account of the creation of the universe and of all living things related in the Bible."  Nothing in the quote speaks to Biblical literalism of any sort, nor has any other evidence been offered despite repeated requests for it.  I think the reversion and the protection are wholly inappropriate. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 18:22, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: In his day, many people tried to apply the ideas of biological evolution to other disciplines.  You had Social Darwinism as an example of this.  The right or wrongness of Social Darwinism has no application to biological evolution.  Some suggested that molecules evolved too - Maxwell is saying that this is not the case.  This is again, not a commentary on biological evolution.  If anything is to be said, it should be "James Maxwell did not belief that the theory of evolution could be applied to molecules."  In this context, it is a rather boring statement and does not have any informational value.  I still cannot find any indication that Maxwell was a creationist - any citations showing that be did belief in the literal truth of the Bible would be useful for disputing this.  Until then, the category should not be applied to Maxwell.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 18:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
1,129

edits

Navigation menu