183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 196:
Line 196: + +
Protest the latest reversion and page protection
*'''This is Conservapedia, and we don't twist and contort and censor quotes to satisfy a liberal desire. Maxwell's quote and opposition to the theory of evolution cannot seriously be refuted. We'll let the reader the decide, and we're not going to censor this.'''
*'''This is Conservapedia, and we don't twist and contort and censor quotes to satisfy a liberal desire. Maxwell's quote and opposition to the theory of evolution cannot seriously be refuted. We'll let the reader the decide, and we're not going to censor this.'''
::: I didn't twist, contort, remove or censor the quote. I didn't modify any part of the article Andy had contributed to or (so far as I can tell) commented on. I removed the classification claiming that Maxwell as a creationist. Although it's not defined here, I assume a creationist is someone who believes in [[creationism]], which ''is'' defined here: "Belief in the literal interpretation of the account of the creation of the universe and of all living things related in the Bible." Nothing in the quote speaks to Biblical literalism of any sort, nor has any other evidence been offered despite repeated requests for it. I think the reversion and the protection are wholly inappropriate. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 18:22, 9 April 2007 (EDT)