nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 194:
Line 194: + +
→Creationist?
:: I'm fine with leaving the quote on the page, without the claim that he was talking about biological evolution. If he's going to be classified as a 'creationist', though, we need either a definition of creationist other than 'someone who believes in the Biblical creation story' or a much different quote. All that said, I still maintain that the quote is very clearly not talking about Darwin's theory of biological evoution. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 18:08, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
:: I'm fine with leaving the quote on the page, without the claim that he was talking about biological evolution. If he's going to be classified as a 'creationist', though, we need either a definition of creationist other than 'someone who believes in the Biblical creation story' or a much different quote. All that said, I still maintain that the quote is very clearly not talking about Darwin's theory of biological evoution. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 18:08, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
*'''This is Conservapedia, and we don't twist and contort and censor quotes to satisfy a liberal desire. Maxwell's quote and opposition to the theory of evolution cannot seriously be refuted. We'll let the reader the decide, and we're not going to censor this.'''