386
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 505:
Line 505: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 23:27, April 9, 2007
, 23:27, April 9, 2007Why don't we have Ten Commandments?
*Fair enough. BTW, the problem with the protected template, and consensus is, while Ed agreed to it, he expressly said it shouldn't be added to users own pages. So even with "consensus" unless communication is clear, and people actually abide by the intentions of the makers, it all falls apart. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:53, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
*Fair enough. BTW, the problem with the protected template, and consensus is, while Ed agreed to it, he expressly said it shouldn't be added to users own pages. So even with "consensus" unless communication is clear, and people actually abide by the intentions of the makers, it all falls apart. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:53, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
== Why don't we have Ten Commandments? ==
Seems like it would be meaningful to have a full set of 10 commandments, showing that our inspiration comes from the Bible. Surely we can come up with 4 more.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 19:27, 9 April 2007 (EDT)