Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,797
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 222:
Line 222: + +
Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics (view source)
Revision as of 04:24, July 12, 2012
, 04:24, July 12, 2012→This discussion has been dormant for a while. If no refutation of evolution is presented in the next few days based on a proper application of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, I will remove the part of the article in question.
--[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 13:56, 4 July 2012 (EDT)
--[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 13:56, 4 July 2012 (EDT)
:Since it's been a while since any new argument has been presented, I removed the claim that the Second Law disproves evolution from the article. The above discussion makes it clear that this claim was being based on an incorrect understanding of the Second Law. Please do not re-add this claim unless you make a supporting argument on this talk page based on what the law actually says. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 19:03, 11 July 2012 (EDT)
:Since it's been a while since any new argument has been presented, I removed the claim that the Second Law disproves evolution from the article. The above discussion makes it clear that this claim was being based on an incorrect understanding of the Second Law. Please do not re-add this claim unless you make a supporting argument on this talk page based on what the law actually says. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 19:03, 11 July 2012 (EDT)
::Attempts to limit the insight of the Second Law are misplaced. A correct understanding of it does not try to limit its implications.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:24, 12 July 2012 (EDT)
== Zero sum game ==Liberal abuse of the second law of thermodynamics== ==
== Zero sum game ==Liberal abuse of the second law of thermodynamics== ==