Talk:Essay: The question atheists fear

Could we cut down the question?

Instead of this: "What proof and evidence do you have that proves that atheism is accurate and correct?"

Why not a more concice version: "What proof is there for atheism?"

The reason I propose this is "evidence" and "proof" are pretty much the same thing. Likewise, "accurate" and "correct". Do the extra words add something I'm not seeing here?

Proof and evidence are not synonymous. For example, logical proofs. Greg Bahnsen utterly defeated atheist Gordon Stein by demonstrating that atheism/naturalism/materialism cannot account for the existence of logic. Stein was clearly rattled in the debate and became nervous. You can hear the debate and see for yourself at Bahnsen-Stein debate. The debate was another complete humiliation for the atheist community. To this day, the atheist community cannot defeat Bahnsen's argument. See also: Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate

As far as "accurate and correct", atheists are hardheaded and often very narcissistic. No doubt Shockofgod added the emphasis for that reason - so the message would get through. Conservative 15:43, 13 January 2014 (EST)