Talk:Abc conjecture

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AugustO (talk | contribs) at 20:43, October 23, 2015. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Categories

Categories are capitalized. To avoid red links, one should write category:Number Theory instead of category:number theory. --AugustO (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT)

Thanks. The formulation, although commonly reported as stated, seems slightly off - if all the numbers are positive, then of-course the ratio will be positive also.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2015 (EDT)

Sorry, but you are misstating the formula: it is not square-free-part(abc) x r /c... Please revisit your sources.--AugustO (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2015 (EDT)

square-free-part(abc) times (r/c)

"square-free-part(abc) times (r/c) "

That is wrong. --AugustO (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2015 (EDT)

Working Definition

The abc-conjection doesn't deal with single cases, as it is a formula which holds for "almost all" triples of numbers with certain characteristics:

Let ε > 0 be fixed. Then for almost all triplets of co-prime integers a, b and c with a+b=c holds:

Here rad(a b c) is the "radical" of the product , i.e., the product of all unique primes dividing - or, in other words, the square-free-part.

"Almost all triplets" means that there is only a finite number of triplets which violates the condition. Some observations:

  • ε can be chosen as small as you like - as long it is greater than zero.
  • the finite number of exceptions obviously becomes smaller, the bigger ε is chosen.
  • There are infinitely many triplets violating - that's why isn't allowed.