Homosexual logic
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jesuz4Lif (talk | contribs) at 05:18, November 14, 2015. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Homosexual logic is a collection of coherent arguments justifying the persuit of equal rights for homosexuals. Like liberal logic generally, homosexual logic relies on statements that very logical and almost entirely devoid of logical fallacies. Examples include:
- Demonstrating how all people should have equal protection under the law, and refuting the claim that giving homosexuals rights somehow installs them with special rights.
- Showing how homosexuality is not a choice, and refuting ridiculous claims to the contrary.
- Defeating slippery slope arguments in which bigoted conservatives argue that acceptance of homosexuality will lead to a series of bad results that actually will not follow or that have nothing to do with homosexuality.
- Calling out how homophobes cherry-pick those parts of the Bible that suit their purposes, while the same bigots argue that any parts of Scripture--such as genocide by Jews and Christians--that are inconvenient to them need to be "interpreted" correctly or were "nailed to the Cross," or that just by mentioning them, you are "twisting" them in some unspecified way.
- Noting how social conservatives assume that any book with an anti-homosexual slant must be true, and how such people would do better to critically assess whether that book is credible.
- Appealing to public opinion and the growing acceptance of homosexuality--especially among the younger generations, and disproving conservative claims that Americans want homosexuals to shut up.
- Demanding that the conservative interpretation (or misinterpretation) of the Bible be exposed and rejected, and demonstrating how conservative attempts to oppress homosexuals based on Christian principles violates the establishment clause.
- Demonstrating how conservatives support limited government, but only when it suits them, while supporting government oppression of anyone they don't like.
- Demonstrating a long history of persecution, and disproving the ridiculous claims that a democratic republic of an overwhelmingly Christian population cannot possibly experience Christian persecution.