Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis as edited by DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) at 06:29, June 27, 2016. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis, 480 U.S. 470 (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court held that that a regulation banning certain uses of a portion of an owner's property does not require compensation under the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.