User talk:David R

THIS IS A PERSONAL TALK PAGE
♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
Any complaints, compliments, or suggestions should be left here. Only obscene or crude comments will ever be removed from this page.

Archives
Archive 1

Ha ha David. Great banner!--Aschlafly 00:11, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

Thanks! :) I kind of borrowed from yours a bit and then changed a lot around. I still haven't fully grasped how to use divs in Wiki; my HTML tables don't seem to work very well. --<<-David R->> 00:12, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

Thanks.

Honestly, I thought it was a programming error that my name was mentioned in his comment. Please forgive, I'm VERY new to the site. I haven't gotten a straight answer on this: Is any variant on the word Sex forbidden on this site?

Still, you should not have edited his comment. As for your question, I'm not exactly sure what you want to put up. I suppose a good safety measure is to not write anything you wouldn't like your little brother or sister to see. I don't know what that is for you, but you will certainly know if you cross the line. --<<-David R->> 23:53, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

personal talk pages

I don't have a problem with someone clearing their own talk page. replace it if you must, please don't block someone for doing it. --CPAdmin1 00:03, 7 April 2007 (EDT)

Talk pages can be placed in Archives, but they shouldn't be cleared. I don't know what user you really are, but last I heard, comments are not supposed to be deleted unless they're obscene. --<<-David R->> 00:05, 7 April 2007 (EDT)

Complaint

Please, tell me how my edit violated any of those "Commandments". _Ace

See Commandment #3. --<<-David R->> 13:57, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

Please cite the commandment I violated and the Edit that violated it. Also, I think it should be added in the Commandments that conservative bias must be found in all edits. [[User:_Patriot101|_Patriot101

Proposed Block Policy

There has recently been some disagreement over blocks, so I have created a proposed block policy Tell me what you think. --CPAdmin1 23:23, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Sysop Pledge

As my good deed of the day I am requesting that you place this template on your userpage. Participating sysops will earn my respect and gratitude. --BenjaminS 23:58, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Sysop Pledge
As a Conservapedia Sysop, I will NEVER ARBITRARILY block anyone who is not in violation of the Conservapedia Commandments or related CP Guidelines.

Hard to read

The whit lettering on the bluish background ar hard to read, i suggest changing it to black lettering. --CPAdmin1 13:20, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for the suggestion. --<<-David R->> 13:28, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

This looks like your MySpace... CPWebmaster 13:41, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

Haha....yeah, it was definitely a guideline. :) --<<-David R->> 13:41, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

The word "parody"

Please forgive me for pointing this out... People are starting to use the word "parody" a little bit incorrectly, and it's starting to grate on me. If your comments were just typographical errors, my apologies.

A "parody" is to writing what a "caricature" is to sketching. A parody is a piece of writing which imitates its target, but exaggerates or warps it for comic effect. For example, the 1991 movie "Hot Shots!" was a parody of the movie "Top Gun."

The parody is the work, not the person who creates it.

In the context of Conservapedia, it is the remarks or articles which an insincere user writes, not the user himself. The user would properly be called a parodist, not "a parody." Similarly, one would not say "you are not that good a parody" but "you are not that good at parody." Dpbsmith 05:56, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

RFB?

• Please no more unilaterial actions as a Sysop. Who was this approved by? --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 22:37, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

See your talk page. --<<-David R->> 22:39, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

• Andy has explained, David. Please try and let a guy know about stuff...this has all been very controversial, and my intention was to avoid more pot-stirring, and trouble. Sorry for the confusion. --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 23:16, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Tigers letter D

Now how do you go about making one of those little info boxes, like what you have for the Yankees, but inserting the Old English letter "D" in it? I would love to have one for the Detroit Tigers. Karajou 22:54, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Many thanks for the userbox, and to a fan of (and I admit it!) the greatest baseball team in history...but I still love my Tigers! Karajou 23:19, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

nice user page!

Nice user page! The best I've seen!--Aschlafly 22:59, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Haha, thanks. Do you use Mozilla Firefox? It works best in that browser. --<<-David R->> 23:00, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Don't let the new position go to your head if you get it.

Don't let the new position go to your head if you get it. Conservative 00:06, 22 April 2007 (EDT)conservative

Please vote for me

Please vote for me here: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Request_for_Bureaucratship Conservative 19:40, 22 April 2007 (EDT)

Lactose intolerance

I will only say this once, and then move on, and let you decide what to do.

Lactose intolerance is an example of microevolution, which creation scientists have no problem with. [1] And the claims of the natural selection are supported by reference 2 of the article. [2] You don't have to scrub a sentence just because it has "natural" and "selection" in succession with each other.

But I will let you decide what to do. Sterile 09:03, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

Red Sox logo Image:BOS Red Sox.png

I have made a userbox thingy for Juaquin Martinez, as he is a Red Sox fan, and I did use the logo...with the required warning that it might be changed, etc. I am thinking of the possibility that such a logo can be used by a fan as mere fan support for his team, but for that we'd have to check with the owner of the logo. Do you think it's possible? If so, then we could have the real thing displayed on our pages! Karajou 19:30, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

6000 years old?

I'm honestly not in the mood for an argument (major migraine) but could you just sum up how the heck you can think the worlds only 6000 years old?? I don't get it. ThxAtheistKathryn 23:49, 23 April 2007 (EDT)