Talk:Mexico

Thanks for doing the merge, Scott. It's not simply a matter of copy and paste, or I would have done it myself instead of tagging the articles. --Ed Poor 09:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

No worries - I hope the information is correct - I don't know enough about Mexico to tell, but I've fixed a few pretty dodgy country pages today. --Scott 10:14, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

Are American style tacos really the best representative picture for the Mexico article? Czolgolz 22:59, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

Probably not - especially since they're not mentioned in the text. Should they be removed, or have text or caption increased to create some connection? Please do whatever is best, and if you have a better picture, please add it. --Scott 10:51, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Emigration

This new paragraph

== Emigration ==

Many Americans (from US) have become angry at tendency for Mexicans to go to the United States, where there is a perception that they are welcome to go and use this healthy economy to make money. Because many aspects of such a culture (such as the common unwillingness to learn or speak English) which are incompatible with American (from US) values, these people are often unwelcome, especially those who immigrate illegally. Groups such as the Minutemen have been active in stopping this influx (sometimes killing them), but it is still a problem with which the US must contend.

is not in the proper article. This matter concern basically to the United States and there it should be. Not in an article about Mexico.

--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 18:53, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

I'm prone to disagree. Remember that Conservapedia seeks to illuminate the American perspective, so it makes sense that such a huge issue should at least be mentioned. To suggest otherwise would imply a bias for those who choose to come to this country illegally. ATB 18:51, 16 May 2007 (EDT)