Class of one
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (talk | contribs) at 23:01, May 21, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
"Class of one" is a legal argument under the Equal Protection Clause whereby a plaintiff prevails by proving that it "has been intentionally treated differently from others similarly situated and that there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment."[1]
Judge Michael McConnell has embraced a "class of one" argument in concurrence[2]