Assignor estoppel

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (talk | contribs) at 19:38, January 27, 2021. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Assignor estoppel is the patent law doctrine that an assignor of a patent is estopped, or barred, from later contesting the validity of the patent. The logic behind this judge-made doctrine is that by assigning the patent, the patent-holder accepted its validity, and cannot contradict himself on that point later.

The America Invents Act abrogated this doctrine for inter partes proceedings,[1] however, which further undermines the validity of patents like much of what the AIA has done.

On January 8, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court granted cert. in No. 20-440 to consider this question:


“ QUESTION PRESENTED:

In the Patent Act, Congress established that invalidity is a “defense[] in any action involving the validity or infringement of a patent.” 35 U.S.C. § 282(b) (emphasis added).

There is no textual exception to this command. The Federal Circuit nonetheless applies a judge-made “equitable” exception to the statute’s unqualified language known as “assignor estoppel.” Assignor estoppel prevents an inventor who has assigned a patent from later contesting the patent’s validity.

The question is whether a defendant in a patent infringement action who assigned the patent, or is in privity with an assignor of the patent, may have a defense of invalidity heard on the merits.

”

References