Mar-a-Lago raid litigation

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (talk | contribs) at 22:39, October 4, 2022. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mar-a-Lago raid litigation included an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court filed by Donald Trump on October 4.[1] The application cites 69 precedents in favor of overruling the Eleventh Circuit decision that stayed a good district court ruling:

Arguments made

  • that the Eleventh Circuit lacked jurisdiction to stay the special master order concerning review of classified documents
  • that the district court did not abuse its authority to allow the special master to review the classified documents

Precedents cited

A total of 69 decisions are cited in Trump's application:

  • Abelesz v. Erste Grp. Bank AG, 695 F.3d 655 (7th Cir. 2012)
  • Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651 (1977)
  • Al Odah v. United States, 559 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (repeatedly cited)
  • Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 424 F.3d 1117 (11th Cir. 2005) (repeatedly cited)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
  • Baltimore Contractors v. Bodinger, 348 U.S. 176 (1955)
  • Bogard v. Wright, 159 F.3d 1060 (7th Cir. 1998)
  • Bogosian v. Woloohojian Realty Corp., 923 F.2d 898 (1st Cir. 1991)
  • BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 141 S. Ct. 1532 (2021)
  • Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886 (1961)
  • Carpenter v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 541 F.3d 1048 (11th Cir. 2008)
  • Carson v. Am. Brands, Inc., 450 U.S. 79 (1981)
  • Certain Named & Unnamed Non-Citizen Child. & Their Parents v. Texas, 448 U.S. 1327 (1980)
  • Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)
  • Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)
  • Coleman v. Paccar, Inc., 424 U.S. 1301 (1976)
  • Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. Stidham, 640 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2011) (repeatedly cited)
  • Deckert v. Indep. Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282 (1940)
  • Dep’t of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988)
  • Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc., 511 U.S. 863 (1994)
  • Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368 (1981)
  • Gardner v. Westinghouse Broad. Co., 437 U.S. 478 (1978)
  • Gary W. v. Louisiana, 601 F.2d 240 (5th Cir. 1979)
  • Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134 (2012)
  • Grilli v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 78 F.3d 1533 (11th Cir.1996)
  • Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271 (1988)
  • Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006)
  • Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U.S. 183 (2010)
  • I.A.M. Nat. Pension Fund Benefit Plan A v. Cooper Indus., Inc., 789 F.2d 21 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
  • In re Deepwater Horizon, 793 F.3d 479 (5th Cir. 2015)
  • Int’l Prod. Corp. v. Koons, 325 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1963)
  • Jones v. Clinton, 72 F.3d 1354 (8th Cir. 1996)
  • Jones v. Fransen, 857 F.3d 843 (11th Cir. 2017)
  • Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Nat’l Archives & Recs. Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012)
  • King v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 562 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 2009)
  • Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd.,

101 F.3d 863 (2d Cir. 1996)

  • La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.,

352 U.S. 249 (1957)

  • Lyons v. PNC Bank, Nat’l Ass’n,

26 F.4th 180 (4th Cir. 2022) (repeatedly cited)

  • Macri v. U.S. ex. rel. John H. Maxwell & Co.,

353 F.2d 804 (9th Cir. 1965)

  • McFarlin v. Conseco Servs., LLC,

381 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2004)

  • Microsoft Corp. v. Baker,

137 S. Ct. 1702 (2017)

  • Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter,

558 U.S. 100 (2009) (repeatedly cited)

  • Moore v. City of Wynnewood,

57 F.3d 924 (10th Cir. 1995)

  • Morrison v. Olson,

487 U.S. 654 (1988)

  • Myers v. Hertz Corp.,

624 F.3d 537 (2d Cir. 2010)

  • Nat’l Org. for the Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Mullen,

828 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1987)

  • Nken v. Holder,

556 U.S. 418 (2009)

  • O’Hanlon v. Uber Techs., Inc.,

990 F.3d 757 (3d Cir. 2021)

  • Pickett v. Texas Tech Univ. Health Scis. Ctr.,

37 F.4th 1013 (5th Cir. 2022)

  • Police Ass’n of New Orleans ex rel. Cannatella v. New Orleans,

100 F.3d 1159 (5th Cir. 1996)

  • Price v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya,

389 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

  • Puente Arizona v. Arpaio,

821 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2016)

  • Reid v. Doe Run Res. Corp.,

701 F.3d 840 (8th Cir. 2012) (repeatedly cited)

  • Reynolds v. McInnes,

380 F.3d 1303, fn. 3 (11th Cir. 2004)

  • Rux v. Republic of Sudan,

461 F.3d 461 (4th Cir. 2006)

  • Shakman v. Clerk of Cook Cnty.,

994 F.3d 832 (7th Cir. 2021)

  • Smith v. Barry,

502 U.S. 244 (1992)

  • Swint v. Chambers Cnty. Comm’n,

514 U.S. 35 (1995) (repeatedly cited)

  • Switz. Cheese Ass’n, Inc. v. E. Horne’s Mkt., Inc.,

385 U.S. 23 (1966)

  • Thompson v. Enomoto,

815 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1987)

  • Thornburgh v. Am. Coll. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists,

476 U.S. 747 (1986)

  • Trump v. United States of America, No. 9:22cv-81294-AMC at ECF No. 64, 2022 WL 4015755 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 5, 2022)
  • Trump v. United States, No. 22-13005, 2022 WL 4366684 (11th Cir. Sept. 21, 2022) (repeatedly cited)
  • United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974)
  • United States v. North, 910 F.2d 843 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
  • United States v. Samueli,

582 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2009)

  • Vt. Agency of Nat. Res. V. U.S. ex rel. Stevens,

529 U.S. 765 (2000)

  • W. Airlines, Inc. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters,

480 U.S. 1301

  • Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson,

13 F.4th 434 (5th Cir. 2021)

  • Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun,

516 U.S. 199 (1996)

Statutes cited

  • U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2
  • 18 U.S.C. § 793(e)
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1291
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (and subparts)
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (and subparts)
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
  • 44 U.S.C. § 2201 (and a subpart)
  • 44 U.S.C. § 2203(b)
  • 44 U.S.C. § 2203(f)(1)
  • 44 U.S.C. § 2205(3)
  • 50 U.S.C. § 3161
  • 50 U.S.C. § 3163

References

  1. ↑ https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22A283/242439/20221004150805615_22-%20Application%20for%20Stay.pdf
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mar-a-Lago_raid_litigation&oldid=1891299"