Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat
From Conservapedia
In Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (1977), the U.S. Supreme Court held that antitrust damages are not available to a competitor whose "sole injury alleged is that competitors were continued in business, thereby denying respondents an anticipated increase in market shares." 429 U.S. at 484.
