Government speech

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (talk | contribs) at 02:43, August 13, 2024. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Government speech is “speech” -- expressive activity that is “intended to be communicative” -- which is spoken by the government.

Examples include:

  • accepting monuments for placement in a city park, which “constitute[d] government speech” because the monuments were “meant to convey and have the effect of conveying a government message.” Summum, 555 U. S., at 472;
  • "We must decide whether that rejection [of a Confederate flag license plate] violated the Constitution’s free speech guarantees. See Amdts. 1, 14. We conclude that it did not." Walker v. Tex. Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 576 U.S. 200, 203-04 (2015)

Stated another way, the purposeful communication of the speaker’s own message generally qualifies as “speech.” Shurtleff v. City of Bos., 596 U.S. 243, 267 (2022).

Counterexample

Trademarks are not government speech:

“ The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) denied the application based on a provision of federal law prohibiting the registration of trademarks that may “disparage ... or bring ... into contemp[t] or disrepute” any “persons, living or dead.” 15 U.S.C. §1052(a). We now hold that [1] this provision violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. It offends a bedrock First Amendment principle: Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend. ”

Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. 218, 223 (2017).