User talk:HenryS

Now I see that you are back. Great. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 21:08, 1 November 2007 (EDT)

Welcome back!--Aschlafly 22:14, 11 January 2008 (EST)

Are you back? --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 10:21, 5 February 2008 (EST)

My vandal counter

It's there, but I had to hide it, because it attracted too many Bohdans vandals. HelpJazz 00:03, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Could you have a read of Holodomor denial. Thanks.--Bandurist 12:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Sysop

Welcome back to your Sysop status, Bohdan! We've missed you, and your expertise about Eastern Europe.--Aschlafly 14:46, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks! But I might not be very active... Nevertheles, I will try to help. Bohdan 14:58, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Congratulations Bohdan. Absentismens 01:26, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Question

Is there a place I can ask the community as a whole something?--FellowChristian16 16:36, 19 March 2008 (EDT)

I also have a question. Currently there are three broken redirects. Should I delete the redirects and request deletion of the page? or just name the pages and allow a sysop to delete them? DrCB 21:35, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

Really random

I was taking a nap today and you were in my dream. I had a dream that my real life cat (who's name is Jazz... my secret's out) was actually a housefly, and not a cat. And then my cousin found out that she was actually a unicorn and she was flying around the house trying to catch and eat my pet fly. And then it wasn't my pet cat/fly named Jazz, it was my pet cat/fly named Bohdan. I was all like "oh no, cousin! Don't eat Bohdan, I will be sad!"

I have strange dreams. HelpJazz 22:09, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

I am so honored :) Bohdan 22:39, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

deletion of lawyer values

Dear Bohdan,

Could you please explain why you deleted this article?

thanks--JBuscombe 16:41, 28 March 2008 (EDT) also what is this WP:POINT?--JBuscombe 16:50, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

It was unencyclopedic, and obviously just a response to professor values. If you have a problem with that article, go to the talk page. Please do not create unencyclopedic articles to make a point. It is disruptive. Thanks, Bohdan 16:51, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

WP:POINT is a policy on wikipedia. [1] Bohdan 16:52, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

Dear Bohdan

How can you say Lawyer values is unencyclopedic and disruptive while Professor values are not? It was not just a response to the Professor values, but was inspired by it! I do not believe it was in any way disruptive. I am sure the public opinion about lawyers are more in line with what I wrote while the public still respect Professors. --JBuscombe 17:04, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

I point you to the newly-created tu quoque. You don't have to show that professor values is right to show that lawyer values is wrong. HelpJazz 21:35, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

I actually never said I consider professor values to be encyclopedic. But the author of that article is the owner of the site, and he has said before that it won't be deleted. Please take any issues you have with professor values to its talk page. Thanks, Bohdan 17:57, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

Did you just delete something for breaking a rule that doesn't exist on this site? --Gulik5 21:32, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

The CP Commandments demand the truth. Bohdan was right, IMO. However the real point is, he answered the question as to why he removed it, clearly and concisely. Editors who keep repeating and asking in several different ways are indeed just trying to be disruptive. It is the job of CP Sysops to decide those questions, "what is encyclopedic" and what isn't. --₮K^/Talk 21:40, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

Wish you still had that banhammer, don't you? What a shame! just be patient --Kajira 11:18, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

He will for the good fate of CP. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 14:51, 29 March 2008 (EDT)