Last modified on April 17, 2008, at 14:25

Class of one

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) at 14:25, April 17, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.

"Class of one" is a legal argument under the Equal Protection Clause whereby a plaintiff prevails by proving that it "has been intentionally treated differently from others similarly situated and that there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment."[1]

Judge Michael McConnell has embraced a "class of one" argument in concurrence[2]

References

  1. ↑ Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000).
  2. ↑ Christian Heritage Acad. v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8186 (10th Cir. Apr. 9, 2007).