Talk:Answers in Genesis
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AmesG (talk | contribs) at 03:06, March 21, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
I think we all need to agree that AiG doesn't count as a valid source to cite for Conservapedia. Having read through its site pretty thoroughly, I can say that it's an extremely biased and opinionated organization with little to no actual scientific value.-AmesG 22:45, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Yes we should use it! And of course it is biased - it has a conservative Christian bias! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smile (talk)
- Andy has yet to admit that the site is biased. He's still pretending it's neutral. Until he does otherwise, we should keep the "dream" alive.-AmesG 23:06, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views
Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views? Is the article correct? There is no citation. Conservative 23:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
- Only Genesis. No evil-ution. They're that nuts.-AmesG 23:06, 20 March 2007 (EDT)