Talk:Exact sciences
From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WesleyS (Talk | contribs) at 04:05, February 22, 2009. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Witnessing Evolution
Wasn't the whole point of the Lenski Experiment that it provided conclusive evidence of bacteria evolving a useful trait over thousands of generations, and the specimens that inherited the trait thrived compared to those that did not? That would be a contemporary witnessing of evolution, I'd think. --DinsdaleP 10:16, 21 February 2009 (EST)
- By evolution, I mean the theory of evolution through natural selection, which posits that significant new species have come into being without intelligent intervention.
- Whenever we discuss evolution, we need to cut through the mental fog and specify which aspects of evolution we're talking about. Most evolution opponents grant that a species can develop new characteristics in the wild (see microevolution). --Ed Poor Talk 10:26, 21 February 2009 (EST)
- Perhaps it was just a contemporary witnessing of adaptation - an ability it's designer gave it to deal with differing environmental contexts. --Qwestor Talk 11:39, 21 February 2009 (EST)
Creation Science
Though I am a creationist, I would think that creation science should probably go into the same category as evolution, as a fuzzy subject. Anyone else have any thoughts? --JoshuaStanley 22:28, 21 February 2009 (EST)
- I agree, as well as baraminology. WesleySHello! 23:05, 21 February 2009 (EST)
