Talk:World History Homework Ten Answers - Student Two
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (talk | contribs) at 17:35, April 20, 2009. It may differ significantly from current revision.
This talk page? To start, we need a definition for evolution. By evolution, I mean the biological process by which less complex organisms slowly become more complex. Of course I reject the standard, naturalistic Theory of Evolution.
But I don't see why creation must necessarily be direct, rather than through evolution. I already consider literal Adam and Eve and original sin to be foregone conclusions. My question is why living organisms need to be separately created. I want to understand why creationists reject this possibility. AddisonDM 16:21, 19 April 2009 (EDT)
- Several reasons for rejecting it:
- it's virtually impossible to construct the complex from the simple. No one would build a car from a bicycle, for example.
- evolution requires enormous time even if it were possible, time that contradicts evidence and the Bible
- flooding, which is occurs often (and was referenced by Jesus), destroys any possibility of an evolutionary process
- there are too many Counterexamples of Evolution for it to be plausible
- why the urge to embrace an atheistic, deceit-ridden theory?
- --Andy Schlafly 13:35, 20 April 2009 (EDT)