Last modified on April 3, 2007, at 13:55

Talk:Howard Stern

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RexMundane (Talk | contribs) at 13:55, April 3, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Return to "Howard Stern" page.

Look, CoulterMan, maybe then you can explain to me why its relevant to Stern's politics that he had Moore on at one point? Or why in a discussion about Stern's politics its necessary to describe Stem-Cell research as basically Murder? Its editorializing where none is necessary. Thats why I keep cutting it out, can you tell us why you keep putting it in? Theres no descriptive paragraph explaining what Satellite Radio is when thats mentioned, and no paragraph describing Boston University when its mentioned, so why hold up Stern's political section with an inflammatory description of stem cells? Plus, having Moore on his show is irrelevant to Stern's political views since he has alot of people on. He's had Drew Carey on and He's a registered republican, so what the hell's the point of mentioning just one guest? And to say that he "even" had Moore on, as though that crosses some kind of line, where is the sense in this? Explain yourself.--RexMundane 19:21, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

"that involves the killing and cloning of human embryos"

The passage "that involves the killing and cloning of human embryos" has been removed with this edit (which is marked as minor - but isn't). Does anyone have anything to back this up either way? The removal of this phrase significantly changes what is said when it comes to stem cell research. --Mtur 21:15, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

  • Listen to his show! That's what he supports! -- CoulterMan 08:43, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
Nobody's challenging that that he supports embryonic stem cell research, but unless stern himself has said, directly, that he supports embryo-killing, then its not necessary to say it. Unless you can say "Stern has said that he supports 'the killing and cloning of human embryos'" as a direct quote from him then its completely unnecessary to describe it in imflammatory language just for your own petty need to frame the debate however you like. Grow up about this, and realize that nobody in fact wants to hear you editorialize, especially when it takes the article away from its subject matter (Stern) into where you want to go just to vent (Moore and Stem Cells, frinstance).