Deliberate ignorance

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DavidE (talk | contribs) at 18:25, March 3, 2011. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. A related concept is the fallacy of invincible ignorance. Examples of deliberate ignorance include:

(add more)

Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:

  • "I find that hard to believe!" (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by liberals[3])
  • "I'm not aware of that!" (without admitting a failure to look)
  • "I've never seen that in the New York Times!"
  • "That's not what it said in my (public school) textbook!"
  • "Let's talk about something else!"
  • "I'm not interested in that!"
  • "They hate us for our freedom!"
  • "Complete suspension of disbelief!"
  • "That offends me!" (used as an excuse not to consider facts or logic)
  • "You're persecuting me!" (when the "persecution" consists only of pointing out inconvenient facts or logic)

Crime of Deliberate Ignorance

Deliberate ignorance can be a crime. For example, jurors were instructed "to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy."[4]

References