Talk:Anders Behring Breivik

I removed the accusations that the whole thing was a setup for false flag type reasons because the guy admitted to the crime, there is no evidence to doubt this admission, and I understand that Savage has retracted his earlier statements. Lets deal with facts not unhelpful speculations. --DamianJohn 01:59, 26 July 2011 (EDT)

I agree, the version before this one was bizarre and fringe. TerryB 08:54, 26 July 2011 (EDT)

To Daniel

I'm trying to clean up the grammar and punctuation on this article, and I can't make out just what you're trying to say in this sentence:

• While the manifesto contains a legal disclaimer, (p. 766-68) yet Breivik details how Islam invaded Europe in the past and was defeated, and expresses plans to combat, by an "armed indigenous rights movements/resistance movement" (p. 668), the latest Islamic invasion/attack in which they employ "demographic warfare." (p. 816)

What does the legal disclaimer have to do with the rest of the sentence? Were you trying to say something about the disclaimer and got distracted? Please clarify this section.

Thanks! --SharonW 22:48, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

Split article

I would like to propose this article be split into two different ones. The article on Breivik should probably include his biography, the attacks, the aftermath, world reaction and a brief description of his manifesto. The reaction and analysis section should probably be under a separate article, as it deals more with the rationale and beliefs behind his actions. Any thoughts? --SharonW 02:11, 31 July 2011 (EDT)

It could be restructured Sharon. I set it up as it was due to my lack of compiled referenced info on biography, the attacks, and my or emphasis on his ideology and responses/analysis. But i do not think anything should be deleted from those, as it is important and likely to be missing from other reports. Daniel1212 09:23, 1 August 2011 (EDT)